- 1Understand the method
- 2Do it
- 3Check the result
How to do this task
Follow the method below, do the task, then check the result. Tool links show options, not extra steps you must complete.
Start with the step-by-step guide below to prepare the role criteria. Use one assistant you already have access to: paste the criteria and the prompt below into its chat, then bring the draft back to the guide for review. The assistant is an optional route; AhaDo provides the worksheet and does not generate interview questions on this page.
View ChatGPT instructions →Use only the approved role criteria below. For each labelled criterion, draft one behavioural or job-situation question, one follow-up, and observable points for the interviewer to look for. Return a table: criterion label | main question | follow-up | review points | unresolved decisions. Keep questions tied to the work. Do not add qualifications, ask about irrelevant personal matters, or score or rank candidates. Mark uncertain requirements as questions for the hiring panel. Role criteria:- A vague question such as “Are you good at communication?” produces a general claim. Ask for a specific work example, then follow up on the person’s action and how they checked the result.
- The AI invents a hiring threshold such as five years of experience. Remove it unless the approved role brief requires it; ask the hiring panel to resolve the gap.
- Different candidates receive unrelated questions or personality judgements. Return to the shared job criteria and ask the panel to review the question set before use.
Do it with the right tool
Work through this task step by step
Prepare your material, copy the prompt, then check and revise the draft.
Start the guided workflow →Need help choosing an assistant?
Use one assistant you can access, including one you already know. The tools below are alternatives, not extra steps. Check access, required features and data rules before using one.
- Example tool for this task
A general-purpose AI assistant for chat, analysis, writing, images and files.
See full tool details →Good for- Broad personal and work tasks
- Multimodal questions with text, images and files
Watch out- Verify factual claims and citations
- Review current data controls before pasting work material
- Another tool in a matching category
A Chinese AI assistant known for reasoning and coding-oriented models.
See full tool details →Good for- Checking a maths solution one step at a time
- Grouping short feedback excerpts with quote labels
Watch out- Browser chat access and API billing are separate
- A long explanation can still contain a wrong step
- Another tool in a matching category
Google’s general AI assistant for everyday questions, files and connected Google workflows.
See full tool details →Good for- Summarising a small uploaded document
- Questioning a spreadsheet with source-cell checks
Watch out- Drive connections have different requirements from local file uploads
- A successful upload does not prove every page was read correctly
Paste this prompt with your material into the assistant you chose.
Use only the approved role criteria below. For each labelled criterion, draft one behavioural or job-situation question, one follow-up, and observable points for the interviewer to look for. Return a table: criterion label | main question | follow-up | review points | unresolved decisions. Keep questions tied to the work. Do not add qualifications, ask about irrelevant personal matters, or score or rank candidates. Mark uncertain requirements as questions for the hiring panel. Role criteria:Human check before use
- Every question maps to an approved role criterion; added requirements remain proposals.
- The hiring panel agrees the core questions, order and review criteria before using them consistently.
- Remove irrelevant personal questions. People review answers and make hiring decisions; this exercise does not score candidates.
Where this comes from
No real usage, success rate, elapsed time or edit rate has been measured for this task yet.
- Source type
- AhaDo task instructions
- Collected on
- 2026-09-07
- Verification status
- Real-user results not yet measured
- Sample size
- No user samples yet
Report a correction
Point out a missing step or an unsafe claim. Your note is saved in your workspace for review.
